Many big decisions: On the day Lucknow was burning in the fire of violence, the assembly session was also going on, where all the laws related to public interest were also passed, but no one could find it. Most of the media was engaged in broadcasting only pictures of violence.
In Uttar Pradesh, the atmosphere of the state has been spoiled due to the unreasonable violence in the name of NRC (whose blueprint has not yet been prepared) and the cab, along with the loss of life and property. In the midst of this violence, all the news related to the public like TET, teacher recruitment test or cancellation of examinations in all school-colleges could not become an issue. On the day Lucknow was burning in the fire of violence, the assembly session was also going on, where all the laws related to public interest were also passed, but no one could find it. The Yogi government passed a supplementary budget of Rs 4,210.85 crore for the year 2019–20, amid opposition from the opposition in the Assembly over the cab. Along with this, five more MLAs were also approved in both the Houses, including Uttar Pradesh Penal Law (Mitigation of Offenses and Abatement of Variations) Amendment Bill 2019, Uttar Pradesh Education Services Selection Commission Bill 2019.
Many big decisions of the court were also submerged in this violence, whose arrival was awaited for a long time. Whether it is the punishment of the former BJP leader and MLA Kuldeep Sengar in jail till death till death and a fine of 25 lakh rupees in the Unnao rape case or life imprisonment for two people in the court serial blast case, from newspaper pages to electronic news channel But even this news could not make it to the place she deserved. Remember when the name of BJP MLA Kuldeep Sengar came out in the Unnao rape case, there was so much anger among people against it, there was a long debate in the electronic news channels, so the news in the print media was read with the editorial. Were. Similarly, there was a stir in 2007 about the serial serial ballast, but when the Many big decisions was taken, there was no discussion anywhere. There was no response. Because the whole country was in the grip of violence about cabs. Leaving aside the issue of print media, reports of violence are always a booster for the electronic media. The scene of an event is created by showing it repeatedly on the screen.
In such a situation, Many big decisions it is necessary to discuss the justice given to the victim of Unnao. The punishment awarded by the Tis Hazari court to Uttar Pradesh legislator Kuldeep Sengar for life imprisonment is significant in many ways. One, the verdict has not been prolonged, and the court has also cleared the way for financial help for the rape victim. It has been said in most of the discussions that the judiciary delays in sentencing, due to which the fear of such criminals is dissipated, but perhaps this high-profile case will become an example for those who keep Kannu in their pocket. Let’s pretend The CBI had filed a charge sheet against Kuldeep Sengar in the court in July this year. The court sentenced him within six months. But the role of Uttar Pradesh Police in the whole case was very disappointing. Of course, Kuldeep Sengar still has the option of going to the upper courts, but the way the Delhi court has shown, It is expected that the same speed will be seen in the upper courts as well and this punishment will become a precedent. But when we are talking about the punishment by the court in six months, we also have to keep in mind that this incident of rape was done by Sanger in June 2017. Had the case not been handed over to the CBI, it would probably have taken more than two years to file the final charge sheet. The UP police did not even register an FIR for the rape for a long time, in order to teach the victim a lesson, her father was not only put in jail on false charges, but he was also tortured. So we also have to keep in mind that Sanger committed this rape incident in June 2017. Had the case not been handed over to the CBI, it would probably have taken more than two years to file the final charge sheet. The UP police did not even register an FIR for the rape for a long time, in order to teach the victim a lesson, her father was not only put in jail on false charges, but he was also tortured. So we also have to keep in mind that Sanger committed this rape incident in June 2017. Had the case not been handed over to the CBI, it would probably have taken more than two years to file the final charge sheet. The UP police did not even register an FIR for the rape for a long time, in order to teach the victim a lesson, her father was not only put in jail on false charges, but he was also tortured. The report of the case was written only after the victim attempted self-immolation in front of the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister’s residence, but the truth was that the next day her father died in police custody under suspicious circumstances. The entire fight of the victim was not easy, as many top officials of the state refused to take action against the MLA. The month in which a charge sheet was filed in Delhi, the same month a road accident occurred with the victim, about which the victim, her family and close people said that it was not a road accident, an attempt was made to kill her. In the said road accident, two of the victim’s relatives were killed in the accident and the victim and her lawyer were injured. The good thing is that the court understood this and directed the CBI to review the threat and its safety on the victim every three months. The case of this rape victim of Unnao tells how difficult the battle becomes when a high profile leader or person commits harassment of a common man. Kuldeep Sengar was associated with the ruling party, so the attitude of the entire system was uncooperative with the victim. When there was a lot of uproar, the BJP suspended him from the party. During the last general election, BJP candidate from Unnao and now MP Sakshi Maharaja reached all limits when he went to jail to meet Kuldeep. There were Many big decisions occasions when Kuldeep Sengar kept on showing his hank and intimidation, but in the end, he reached behind bars of the prison on the lines of all goodness, now he will have to remain in Taumer jail.
Like Kuldeep Sengar, another imprisonment came from the Faizabad court. 13 years ago, in the court premises of Lucknow, Varanasi and Faizabad, on the same day, in a serial bomb blast case (Faizabad), a court there (Faizabad) said two convicts Mohammad Akhtar alias Tariq and Tariq of the bomb blast in Faizabad court. Kazmi was sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of 50–50 thousand rupees. At the same time, the third accused Sajjadur rahman, who was detained in Ayodhya Mandal Prison, was acquitted by giving the benefit of the message due to lack of evidence. Four people, including an advocate, were killed in these blasts. Many big decisions was delivered by Special Judge Ashok Kumar on 20 December 2019 amid tight security. During this time, accused Azamgarh resident of Barabanki Jail ‘ Sajjadur Rahman, who was detained in Tariq Kazmi and Ayodhya Mandal Jail, was presented in the special court of the Mandal Prison amid tight security. Apart from this, Mohammad Akhtar alias Tariq, a resident of Kashmir, who was detained in Lucknow Jail, was presented in the Mandal Jail through video conferencing. Earlier, the fourth accused, Mo. Khalid Mujahid died in Barabanki on 13 May 2014 when he was being taken back to Lucknow Jail after his appearance from the Faisalabad Mandal Prison. Significantly, the incident of Faizabad court serial blast took place on 23 November 2007. The incident took place in two advocate sheds in which the first bomb blast took place in Advocate shed number four and the second shed number 20. In the first blast, veteran advocate Radhika Prasad Mishra, stamp vendor Jagdamba Pandey, Munshi Fagu and the lawyer Keshari Prasad were killed. Also, two dozen people including women advocate Rekha Mehrotra were injured in the incident. In this case, a case was filed against unknown accused in various serious sections in the city Kotwali Faizabad on the Tahrir of the then Bar Association Minister Mansoor Elahi. Let us tell that Tariq Kazmi and Mohammed Akhtar alias Tariq, accused in the bomb blast in Lucknow Civil Court premises along with Faizabad, have been sentenced to life imprisonment by special judge Babita Rani of Lucknow on 27 August 2018. He also fined the accused. One of the accused in the case, Khalid Mujahid, has died. Whereas, an accused Sajjadurrarahman has been discharged. According to public prosecutor MK Singh, a charge sheet was filed against the accused under the sedition, criminal conspiracy, attempt to murder and Explosive Substances Act and Prevention of Unlawful Activities Act. The special court sentenced the convicts to all these charges. Talk of Varanasi that where there was a bomb blast with Lucknow, Faizabad, there is a very slow pace of justice (Varanasi). 9 people were killed in the court serial blast here, four dozen were injured, but in Varanasi, no accused has been remanded in this case so far. Only Tahrir and FIR are present in connection with the incident in the CJM court. No statement was taken from the injured advocates nor did anyone inspect the scene. In the end, it will be said that in the name of opposing the Citizenship Amendment Bill, in order many big decisions to show their strength to the Modi-Yogi government, a section of people, by arising, arson and stone-pelting the state in an atmosphere of anarchy, The punishment that the miscreants get is less. The police beatings, stoning them cannot be justified in any way. The miscreants did not gain anything from this, but as the scope of the investigation of violence increases, the difficulties for these miscreants will increase. If the number of miscreants arrested now is in the hundreds, then it can reach in thousands.
If you like this post please share it to Facebook and like our Facebook page.
Next Article: Making cake in cooker is very easy, know how to make it